OmegaHarbinger

I know. That was precisely the problem. You just said me and Snakeplissken were both equally to blame for the incident which is absurd. Yes, I am bold enough to raise a fuss when I'm being treated unfairly. It's not my fault he's a liar and you chose to give him more credit than he deserves. I still don't follow how you got confused. I attempted to correct him in a less abrasive way but it was having no effect. He stubbornly kept insisting that I said something which I did not so naturally I got angry. I shouldn't need to remain silent when someone is shoving words down my throat. Your recommendations are logical but oversimplify things. I don't believe I've deviated from those guidelines at all. Let's say person A claims Perry White can benchpress more weight than Superman. Person B next submits an example which proves he definitely can't and this causes person A to say person B is a moron lacking a brain. Is person B supposed to abandon the thread just because person A is being a jerk? I don't think so. Moderators exist for that purpose. Certain things are open to interpretation while others are not. When you can count on moderators to erase unprovoked insults directed at you, there's no need to retaliate but moderators who just blame both parties for a situation accomplish nothing. That's the approach lazy parents take to resolving a dispute. You haven't stricken all the BS from this thread. You've just randomly erased the stuff from today leaving yesterday's bickering perfectly intact. How is that a solution? As far as I can tell, there's no the deterrent to being rude at this forum. If you cross the line like Chug and Magic 8 ball, you get your posts edited. That's just as ineffective at ending the problem as cops catching a burglar, returning the stolen money, and letting him go. You both were you both at fault...i dont see Snake fighting the fact that his part was just as guilty as yours...How are you being treated unfairly? did you get a warning from me? NO Did i lock the thread? NO You just proved my point of Ignorance...If person A is being a Jerk then why stoop to thier level! why is it so hard to live and let live...remember this is the internet not a boxing ring. Mods shouldnt have to babysit mature conversations, if someone says something you dont like who cares, let it slide unless its a DIRECT ATTACK to you, then get a MOD involved. Someone calling you a moron shouldnt be a red alert code. Someone harrassing your nationality, race, sexual oreintation, etc is. I saw nothing in the threads that warranted close to a dozen PMs...as far as what i deleted i told you in one of your many PMs that I AM AT WORK!!!! I check on here when i can for what ever limited time i do have to be here while im at work! It doesnt bother me that you dont like me nonabrasive approach to how i handled this situation...it is your opinion to like it or not....i felt it was the most fair way...but the way you are handling yourself now tells me that the only verdict you wanted to hear was me pointing blame on Snake. So again i'll say that, Both of you were wrong and that is my verdict! on a side note im sorry for all the DC fans that want to talk about this topic and are interrupted by this! You're wrong. I was not at fault which is exactly how I'm being treated unfairly. Snakeplissken isn't debating that he's half to blame because deep down he knows he got off easy. He deserved the full blame for instigating that fight. What point has been proven with my example? I don't want to act like a wimpy pushover. You can live your life that way if you want but it seems pathetic to me. If someone walks up to you and kicks you in the crotch, do you just ignore that too? How can you be a Batman fan considering he and 95+% of superheroes stoop to the level of villains? I completely disagree that harassment needs to fit into a handful of categories to be serious enough to warrant contacting a moderator. How is being labelled a moronic (fill in the blank gender/race/sexual orientation) any worse than being called a plain moron? I have no way of knowing your work schedule or who reported messages are sent to but it is hilarious to see a moderator complain that he's being asked to do his job. You can say I'm partially to blame until you're blue in the face but that won't make it the least bit true. It's funny to imagine you as a cop reporting to a break in. Let's say an intruder entered a household. An old lady inside manges to creep up behind him with a baseball bat, swings, and knock him unconscious. I guess you think they're both to blame as well. Luckily, the law disagrees with you. The old lady is innocent. Your verdicts are lethargic and lacking any semblance of justice. We're not discussing simple opinions here. You keep repeating that we should all agree to disagree which is always wise advice but it doesn't apply to this situation at all. All of your assumptions about me couldn't be further from the truth. I absolutely can take it when people disagree with me. I welcome a new perspective and some people contribute very enlightening stuff at the DC forum. In fact, I was enjoying the conversation with Magic 8 Ball at first. I'm much more interested to learn an alternative point of view regarding Jason Todd than someone agreeing with me. However, everyone at this forum who hates Jason being resurrected attempts to ridicule the story and they distort all the facts involved. If someone believes that Jason (who was already alive prior to entering a Lazarus pit) was brought back to life by a Lazarus pit, I think they fully deserve the "idiot" label. I rarely resort to that right off the bat though. When I politely say their memory is playing tricks on them or they haven't read the issues closely enough, people like Magic 8 Ball react horribly offended and proceed to include little jabs at my expense in their replies from then on. At that point, I can either trust a moderator to promptly delete the post and reprimand the person or I can take matters into my own hands and show as little respect to them as they've shown to me. Since your response time is so slow and you refuse to side with anyone ever, the latter is the only option. If a total stranger hypothetically accuses you of being a Nazi in public tomorrow, you don't need to agree with their inflammatory suggestion. It's not your fault that a troll is making you look bad and you have every right to defend your integrity. Evidently, you disagree and demand that your fellow board members turn the other cheek.

I know. That was precisely the problem. You just said me and Snakeplissken were both equally to blame for the incident which is absurd. Yes, I am bold enough to raise a fuss when I'm being treated unfairly. It's not my fault he's a liar and you chose to give him more credit than he deserves. I still don't follow how you got confused. I attempted to correct him in a less abrasive way but it was having no effect. He stubbornly kept insisting that I said something which I did not so naturally I got angry. I shouldn't need to remain silent when someone is shoving words down my throat. Your recommendations are logical but oversimplify things. I don't believe I've deviated from those guidelines at all. Let's say person A claims Perry White can benchpress more weight than Superman. Person B next submits an example which proves he definitely can't and this causes person A to say person B is a moron lacking a brain. Is person B supposed to abandon the thread just because person A is being a jerk? I don't think so. Moderators exist for that purpose. Certain things are open to interpretation while others are not. When you can count on moderators to erase unprovoked insults directed at you, there's no need to retaliate but moderators who just blame both parties for a situation accomplish nothing. That's the approach lazy parents take to resolving a dispute. You haven't stricken all the BS from this thread. You've just randomly erased the stuff from today leaving yesterday's bickering perfectly intact. How is that a solution? As far as I can tell, there's no the deterrent to being rude at this forum. If you cross the line like Chug and Magic 8 ball, you get your posts edited. That's just as ineffective at ending the problem as cops catching a burglar, returning the stolen money, and letting him go.

Don't worry. I fully agree with you. I'm quite sure that you'll probably be pleased to know that I also have reported this thread for unprovoked insults as well. I mean, the amount of "douche-baggery" and "acting like a troll" that's taken place is astonishing. Whoops....looks like I obviously quoted the wrong post. @pow@ Silly ol' me. I have no idea how that could have happened. Ahh, here we go. The right poster. Ahem: "Don't worry. I fully agree with you. I'm quite sure that you'll probably be pleased to know that I also have reported this thread for unprovoked insults as well. I mean, the amount of "douche-baggery" and "acting like a troll" that's taken place is astonishing." There we are now. This post couldn't have been more predictable. Since you're too much of a coward to reveal why you hate me so much, I can only draw my own conclusions. Regardless, your vendetta against me just portrays you as an insecure little child whining when someone smarter highlights how little you know. Hate you? HA! Yeah...like I'd really waste time hating someone that I don't even know except on a message board. That's funny....that really is. Heh. That's almost like saying the internet is real life and I should always take it seriously. Hahahahha. My only problem with you is that you act like a douche-bag and a guy with a stick up his ass. That's all. You'll get a lot more customers with lemonade than lemons. Big surprise. In other words, you're jealous than I'm more knowledgeable than you and you dislike me for that reason alone. I'm not selling anything so your analogy doesn't make sense. Choosing to hold a grudge over something so utterly trivial is a sign of a bonafide douche-bag for life with a stick up his ass. Grow up or at the very least quit flinging your feces at others.

Don't worry. I fully agree with you. I'm quite sure that you'll probably be pleased to know that I also have reported this thread for unprovoked insults as well. I mean, the amount of "douche-baggery" and "acting like a troll" that's taken place is astonishing. Whoops....looks like I obviously quoted the wrong post. @pow@ Silly ol' me. I have no idea how that could have happened. Ahh, here we go. The right poster. Ahem: "Don't worry. I fully agree with you. I'm quite sure that you'll probably be pleased to know that I also have reported this thread for unprovoked insults as well. I mean, the amount of "douche-baggery" and "acting like a troll" that's taken place is astonishing." There we are now. This post couldn't have been more predictable. Since you're too much of a coward to reveal why you hate me so much, I can only draw my own conclusions. Regardless, your vendetta against me just portrays you as an insecure little child whining when someone smarter highlights how little you know.

Name one that you haven't crossed first. I'll be glad to apologize. You mean like when I freely admitted it above? Ah, whoops. Good catch. I must have been thinking 'Med Alert' or something... not seeing the 'huge' in this mistake, but thanks for bringing it to my attention. Oooh, more name-calling! But hey, you know, I should be banned for crossing the line, right? It's not like this sort of insult is against the rules... although it is. Hey, you insist on references and issue numbers for everything someone says that you can't easily verify. Turnabout is fair play. You've yet to show a point of view that doesn't involve lording information over people or calling my brainpower into question. I think I have the right to be egotistical in regards to your slanderous attacks. What reputation? I'm upset because you've called every aspect of my mental capacity into question. I don't brag about being a learned person, but I am. My brain is something I value highly, and once you found that to be the case, you continued to assault and insult me on that level. I'm not seeing where I don't have the right to defend myself. It's official. You're totally insane. I *never* insisted on issue numbers or references anywhere. How can you claim to have a photographic memory when your brain constantly remembers things I never said? Regardless of how highly you value your brain (and that sentence reeks of superiority and an out of control ego by the way), your brain is not perfect. In fact, it's not even close. So continue patting yourself on the back that you're a learned person by your own horribly biased account but I'm not impressed at all. I haven't crossed any line and and I'm damn tired of you acting offended when I retaliate at one of your insults directed at me.

Unprovoked insults? Okay, maybe a little bit. Certainly not as many of them as you deserve, but possibly more than you deserve from me. Physical threats? That one's simply not there. The only even slight reference is my saying "I would have kicked your butt to the curb" if I were a mod. I obviously and freely admit to not having the capability. This is aside from the fact that the phrase is an obvious metaphor for the banning you wish upon me. If you'd said 'electronic threat that can't possibly be carried out', you'd have a case. Thanks for proving that you don't read or comprehend half as well as you'd like others to believe you do. Not at all. I don't make claims to be better than anyone but you. My comments in the 'Dick vs. Jason' thread about my memory, intelligence, and the like were in defense only to your heinous assault on those things. No, I reacted with justified anger that you assumed I had no clue what I was talking about due to a lack of memory, comprehension, and intelligence. I freely admit that none of those things are perfect. I have no problem in being wrong. I do, however, bristle at having my opinions and facts disregarded with comments that suggest that I am mentally deficient. I would also like an example of your acceptance of being wrong, since I've often seen you in the wrong, but have never seen you admit it. You're just getting yourself into deeper and deeper trouble with the level of hatred and condescending attitude in all of your posts. I believe in fair moderation and banning only as a last resort for people who prove repeatedly that they don't want to get along and/or can't accept alternative points of view. However, I'll be astonished if you haven't been banned after today because you've crossed the line in a million different ways. You really need to grasp the fact that you're not infallible. The fact that you remembered Lifeline's codename as Red Alert in G.I. Joe : The Movie is more than enough evidence that you're quite capable of making huge mistakes. As for your last sentence, it's a shining example of you being an obnoxious jerk. I'm rarely wrong because I usually don't share my opinions on events and just stick to correcting plain mistakes I notice. Having a point of view you disagree with doesn't make me wrong. It makes you egotistical. I never said you were mentally deficient in the past although your angry insistance that I've somehow tarnished your reputation is a sign that you may need mental help.

Cam Clarke, the voice actor of Prince Adam/He-Man in the recent series, is openly gay. It's a technicality, but you could make the assertion that He-Man (at least, that version of him) is gay as a result. Besides, you've got a well-tanned, half-naked barbarian in bondage gear running around using his 'magic sword' to fight a guy with a bone fetish. This is aside from the fact that he hides this secret from his friends and loved ones while wearing a pink vest. Maybe He-Man isn't directly gay, but it's not hard to see why he's got a large following of gay fans. Oh, and do learn to recognize a joke. Disputing obvious humor with solid facts proves nothing. Since when does an actor's sexual orientation have any impact on the role? According to that wacky point of view, Nightcrawlker is a homosexual because Alan Cumming is openly gay. I guess you haven't read all the articles regarding the X-Men movies where Bryan Singer, Ian McKellan, and Alan Cumming talk about using 'mutant' as a metaphor for gay. I agree. There are too many overly egotistical homosexuals without a sense of humor as it is. Never claimed to be. But hey, thanks for thinking I sound like one. Frankly, if I was a mod, I would have kicked your butt to the curb ages ago... but again, I'm not, so I'll settle for being a voice of reason in your chorus of accusations, egotism, and belittlement. Yeah, it proves that you'll ruin the fun of others so you can feel needed, even though you're obviously not. It proves that you don't know when to be silent and let things go. More than anything else, it proves that you do indeed have that superiority complex I've always accused you of. Mutants being an allegory for homosexuals and an actor being gay being used as evidence that a fictional character is gay are 2 seperate concepts. By the way, I've reported this post for numerous unprovoked insults and physical threats within. I hope you get banned. The hypocrisy in your messages is almost comical. Your off topic rambling about your accomplishents in the Jason Todd thread is proof that your ego is positively unmatched by anyone registered at this forum. I can accept that I'm wrong from time to time but you consistently react with fury at the mere suggestion that your memory is less than perfect.

Cam Clarke, the voice actor of Prince Adam/He-Man in the recent series, is openly gay. It's a technicality, but you could make the assertion that He-Man (at least, that version of him) is gay as a result. Besides, you've got a well-tanned, half-naked barbarian in bondage gear running around using his 'magic sword' to fight a guy with a bone fetish. This is aside from the fact that he hides this secret from his friends and loved ones while wearing a pink vest. Maybe He-Man isn't directly gay, but it's not hard to see why he's got a large following of gay fans. Oh, and do learn to recognize a joke. Disputing obvious humor with solid facts proves nothing. Since when does an actor's sexual orientation have any impact on the role? According to that wacky point of view, Nightcrawlker is a homosexual because Alan Cumming is openly gay. Furthermore, I'm getting pretty sick and tired of you always dictating how I should react to messages. I don't need to share your sense of humor anymore so than I need to share your sexual orientation. Learn to keep your advice to yourself. You're not a moderator so I will never do as you say. I completely disagree with you. Disputing humor with solid facts definitely proves something. Awww. I wanted to see how long this would go on before he realized it was a joke... I'm well aware Snow Serpent was attempting to be funny but there's no mandatory rule that I need to ignore his posts for that reason. Your Civil War signature is obviously supposed to be a joke too but I'm sure some people find it offensive.

Snow_Serpents don't run around in a loincloth and almost nothing covering his chest. He'd fit right in down in Key West. Not to mention that one of his 'allies' is a dude named Fisto. Denial in not just a river in Egypt. Snow Serpents are polar assault troopers so their clothing is appropriate for their environment. He-Man rarely fights in cold weather conditions so there's nothing unusual about him wearing a loincloth. Did you also jump to the conclusion that Quick Kick is gay from watching the Sunbow G.I. Joe movie? According to the reasons you provided, all barbarians such as Conan, Claw the Unconquered, and X-O Manowar are gay too. As for Fisto, he's a relatively minor character in the franchise. In fact, he didn't even appear in season 1 of the Filmation series.

I guess that's why Lou Scheimer Productions created a 58 page long story bible in 1996 for a proposed animated series titled 'He-Ro, Son of He-Man, and the Masters of the Universe'. Adoption. It is legal for gays in Eternia to adopt. It wasn't really a case of adoption. I'm almost 100% positive that the story bible either states or blatantly implies that Dare was going to be revealed as the son of King Adam and Queen Teela in the season 1 finale. That was a smokescreen. Whatever. I found the hint that I remembered from the story bible on page 19. That's fine, but a hint is not definitive proof that He-Man is not gay. It's OK... I guess you also believe the fact that Teela was going to be Adam's Queen in the He-Ro cartoon is not proof that he's straight either. Give me a break. I don't go around labelling the entire Snow Serpent faction as gay based on nothing so why do you feel compelled to label He-Man as gay when nothing supports this claim?

I own that version of the original mini-series too. I was quite surprised at how honest Marv Wolfman is in the exclusive interview. For instance, he doesn't hold back his opinion that Cobra plots were "silly" in the Sunbow series.

I guess that's why Lou Scheimer Productions created a 58 page long story bible in 1996 for a proposed animated series titled 'He-Ro, Son of He-Man, and the Masters of the Universe'. Adoption. It is legal for gays in Eternia to adopt. It wasn't really a case of adoption. I'm almost 100% positive that the story bible either states or blatantly implies that Dare was going to be revealed as the son of King Adam and Queen Teela in the season 1 finale. That was a smokescreen. Whatever. I found the hint that I remembered from the story bible on page 19.

I guess that's why Lou Scheimer Productions created a 58 page long story bible in 1996 for a proposed animated series titled 'He-Ro, Son of He-Man, and the Masters of the Universe'. Adoption. It is legal for gays in Eternia to adopt. It wasn't really a case of adoption. I'm almost 100% positive that the story bible either states or blatantly implies that Dare was going to be revealed as the son of King Adam and Queen Teela in the season 1 finale.

I guess that's why Lou Scheimer Productions created a 58 page long story bible in 1996 for a proposed animated series titled 'He-Ro, Son of He-Man, and the Masters of the Universe'.

WHOA! The ONE pathetic part? @hmmm@ Red Alert: Your vision can be restored... Roadblock, all of 15 seconds later: ...and now I can see it comin' in! You know, because 'can be restored' is exactly the same as 'you'll be up to speed in less than a minute'... It makes Red Alert sound like the worst medic ever. There's never been a G.I. Joe character named Red Alert. You're thinking of Lifeline and apparently confusing his name with the new 2005 medic named Med Alert.