Jump to content

Batman1701

Members
  • Posts

    130
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Previous Fields

  • Country
    United States

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Batman1701's Achievements

Explorer

Explorer (4/14)

  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Dedicated Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare
  • Week One Done Rare

Recent Badges

73

Reputation

  1. Seriously, I mean it, HOLY $#!+ is this a scam!! <P> Taking out the bombs, I can . . . ALMOST get. "No bomb toys for kids" is moronic, overprotective, nanny-state, "THINK OF DA CHILDWEN!!1!" BS (not like there aren't PLENTY of toys with bombs and missiles and military weapons), and it's ESPECIALLY stupid when this is a line SPECIFICALLY targeting the nostalgia market, aimed at older people who grew up with the original toys and maybe want to replace damaged or lost pieces, or want to share that classic experience with their kids, BUT . . . I at least get it. Fine, no bombs. <P> And no bombs means you gotta change the box art, move some stuff around so they aren't throwing bombs, cool, makes sense. "Get 'em!" is a uncreative, slack-@$$ writing as a line replacement, but whatever. <P> But to completely redraw the original box art to replace the old glider with the new one? To deliberately attempt to erase the memory of the old toy by implicitly saying "no no, it's the same thing, look, just like you remember, original art and everything!" like they didn't just toss you a phony imitation of the classic piece? And then to officially call it a "retro reissue" like it's the same toy you remember from the 1980s, and not a developed-30-some-years-later, lower quality copycat from a different series? Essentially a KNOCKOFF of the classic toy you ACTUALLY wanted? <P> That's not just lazy and cheap, and it's not just insulting to the retro collectors' intelligence, IT'S @#$%ING BAIT AND SWITCH.
  2. Wait. <P> Wait a minute. <P> WAIT A @#$%ING MINUTE. <P> THAT. IS. NOT. THE. TURTLE BLIMP!! <P> Or rather, that is not the GLIDER from the original Turtle Blimp. THAT is the glider from TB toy released for the 2012 CGI cartoon! <P> As seen in the image below, the classic glider had upper wings that clipped to the balloon, and lower wings with engines on the side beneath the pilot seat. It looked . . . well, a LOT like the blimp from the original cartoon. <P> THIS ISN'T A TRUE RERELEASE!! The only rerelease of the original toy is the balloon. The glider? That's just a crappy reissue from less than a decade ago. <P> What kind of lazy, half-@$$, cobbled together bull$#!+ is THIS?!? Constant reissues and lazy reuse are one thing, but HALF a reissue? That's an ENTIRELY new low, Playmates!! WTELF!!
  3. Okay, not gonna lie . . . the blimp? THAT is something I might pick up. <P> Mostly because I think it could EASILY be modded/customized into a cartoon-accurate rendition, for use with the NECA TMNT.
  4. Hmmmmmm . . . . <P> I dunno about anyone else of course, but I've actually been ASTONISHED at the speed with which NECA has fulfilled all my TMNT online orders to date (with the exceptions of the second-run Vernon/Rat King, and not counting the pre-orders like Pizza Monster and Mutagen Man/Ace and Antrax/Scumbug, of course). Muckman, Mondo, the Punk Frogs, Chrome Dome, all of them got here really quick, and in Chrome Dome and the Frogs case, they were here literally a week (if not LESS) after the order processed! I couldn't believe it! <P> THAT SAID . . . I know nothing about their OTHER toy lines or the shipping times they're facing. Moreover, if you're ordering from BBTS and not from NECA directly, I would imagine retail website orders get processed AFTER direct-from-manufacturer orders. Then again, I have no actual insight on this (I DO know some old NECA Ambassadors and a Target manager, but from how they tell it, THEY actually get everything FIRST, so . . . . ), so I fully acknowledge that this is speculation. <P> As for this SPECIFIC forum topic . . . Loot Crate shipping, on the other hand, has been downright BAFFLING. Like, delays due to overseas shipping, I get. But I got my notification for my Danny shipment on September 13. Then My shipment just . . . VANISHED for two weeks because FedEx LOST IT IN THEIR OWN DAMN WAREHOUSE. And then it's taken now nearly ANOTHER TWO WEEKS to bounce around the country (including multiple cities on opposite sides of MY OWN STATE) . . . and the package STILL. ISN'T. HERE. YET!!! <P> I want to tear my hair out. Actually, I want to tear SOMEONE ELSE'S hair out in retribution. Yes, I know COVID has slowed things down, and I'm totally cool with that, but I'm watching the tracking in real time, and this isn't COVID, this is UTTERLY NONSENSICAL STUPIDITY. Seriously, WTELF, FedEx?? <P> So . . . yeah. Ocean cargo delays, sure. But honestly, the bigger bottleneck is right here domestically. *SMDH* Crate #2 delayed 'til December? Hell, I'm hardly expecting the FIRST ONE to be here before Christmas!!
  5. In that same "money train" logic vein, Mike Harrigan is a specific case, in that he's a human, and the humans in the Predator/Alien movie lines tend not to sell as well, so I hear. Obviously, NECA has made MULTIPLE figures of ALL the Predators in "Predator 2," so it's not like they won't dip into movies Randy hates. But if the character in question looks like a super generic "guy in plain clothes" and is unlikely to draw consumer attention (like, honestly, not many people even remember who Danny Glover IS, let alone that he was in a Predator movie . . . he's . . . not had a lot of notable work in quite some time), then I can see them turning the idea down. <P> So, like, I wouldn't expect to see April, Whit, Walker, "Wet Willie" Niles, Lord Norinaga, Mitsu, Kenshin, or the Samurai royal guards (although Walker and Norinaga in particular would make AMAZING figure designs), but it wouldn't be out of line to see at least an exclusive box set of the TMNT "in shogun!" Kinda like the "Coming Out Of Their Shells" set. <P> At least, one can only hope!
  6. Oh, I actually have shared a bunch of my stuff on here. My NECA-style custom April O'Neil was "Cool Custom of the Week" on TNI once. <P> But if you'd like to see some more, here's a link: <P> https://www.figurerealm.com/customfigure?action=creator&id=6412 <P> Most of page one is TMNT, but if you go back further, you'll find some different stuff. Although the quality gets worse the further back you go, obviously. *LOL* Though I'm still proud of my MOTU stuff and SOME of the Metroid work.
  7. Keno and Tatsu were always no-brainers from my perspective. I was NOT expecting Danny, honestly, but I've got the Loot Crates ordered. I do wonder if he's an indication that we might get more non-action characters, like Charles and Chief Sterns. (I think Sam Rockwell is too much to hope, guys. *LMAO*) <P> But what I REALLY want to know is . . . dude . . . . <P> . . . Are we going to get movie 3 Samurai Turtles?? <P> 'Cuz as shite as that movie was, those designs were SPECTACULAR!!
  8. I . . . don't know why one would want a TMNT figure that folds into a . . . cube. <P> BUT . . . even if I don't "get" it . . . I will acknowledge that these seem like pretty cool and actually decently made toys. I definitely dig the "robot" aesthetic. And the "Party Wagon" feature is neat. (Even if I wish it looked a bit more accurate, and also what are the OTHER two going to combine into?) <P> Dunno if they're for me, but great figures!
  9. And don't get me wrong, I got no objection to the concept of the crossover. Logic isn't SUPPOSED to be involved (look at "Batman Vs. TMNT"). It's just a fun mish-mash. It's ascended fanfic. There's nothing wrong with that. And as noted by others, the TMNT have been doing that for YEARS. <P> One of my prize additions to my collection is a complete set of Star Trek TMNT from the '90s. They're dumb and whimsical and silly and garish and they're FANTASTIC!! No, the crossover doesn't make sense for them. But more importantly . . . they're GOOD toys. Yes, dated articulation (they ARE from the '90s), but well made for the time, with attention to detail. Totally worth it. <P> These? A bunch of decade-old repaints and some of the worst new-mold 6" figures I've ever seen.
  10. Man . . . naw. I do LOVE TMNT, but THIS one . . . this is WAY more than that. <P> Look up Stan Sakai and his creation. The man is a comic LEGEND. He has been single-handedly writing, drawing, and inking his comic, on paper (not digital), for over 35 years. He has built one of the greatest continuously running comic stories in history, and has maintained a dedication and focus - as well as a level of care and detail, and also historical accuracy, surprisingly enough, for a comic about anthropomorphic animals in Feudal Japan - that is largely unsurpassed in the industry. As a (very small time) professional freelance artist myself, I have a MASSIVE amount of professional respect (and a not insignificant amount of fanboy squeeing *LOL*) for the man and his creation. <P> While the TMNT have been paired with numerous properties over the decades, from Star Trek to Universal Monsters to D&D to Cerebus the Aardvark to . . . Cobra Kai *sigh*, "Usagi Yojimbo" is one of the VERY rare actually widely established collaborative crossovers that the TMNT have engaged in (the most notable others being "Power Rangers" and MAYBE "Batman") across multiple mediums and genres, and the ONLY one that is considered canon to the wider TMNT multiverse as a whole, AND ALSO to Sakai's own works. <P> And of course, while the TMNT have spawned a merchandising empire since their inception, "Usagi Yojimbo" figures are VERY few and far between, and highly articulated ones are near non-existent. So, to get this piece confirmed? It's a damn unicorn (especially given the licensing hoops), and I honestly want to get, like, FIVE of them, just to have one TMNT cartoon version, and then mod the others into various more comic-accurate renditions of the character! <P> This announcement, this figure is AWESOME!!
  11. If this is based on the "Cobra Kai" show, why are Danny and Johnny kids again? <P> Why is Kreese in 1980s fighting shape? No, scratch that, why does he have a TEENAGE body?? <P> Why are all of the humans SO LANKY? <P> Why do the CK figures' bare arms look like sleeves around their wrists? WHAT'S WRONG WITH THEIR WRISTS?? <P> WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THESE FIGURES?!? <P> . . . Oh right. PLAYMATES is going on with these figures. *sigh* <P> Like, we all knew they were just gonna repackage the Classic Collection molds for the . . . *counting* . . . four, five, sixth? Seventh time? And it was a foregone conclusion that they were gonna do their best to use ONE body mold for every CK character. And judging from the new Shredder, it was almost CERTAIN they were gonna make the CK figures small and skinny compared to the oversized chonky Turtles. <P> But . . . somehow, I still didn't expect them to look THIS BAD. Like, I figured the CK license people would be all "yo, Playmates, you put some EFFORT into this crap, or we'll yank the license back from you so fast, you'll get whiplash!" <P> Nope! These are fun from a conceptual standpoint, but this whole line? HARD PASS.
  12. I will answer by repeating my previous statement: @#$% YEAH!!!!! . . . Why, are you NOT?!? *LOL*
  13. . . . $75 each. For '90s figures. Uh . . . . I believe I will let Bender B. Rodriguez take this one:
  14. Okay, so two important points I want to note with this figure, one positive and one negative: <P> 1) Positive: This April is PRECISELY the right scale for the NECA TMNT figures (you know, unlike the actual NECA April figure). I'm certain that some creative customizers would be able to make a GREAT cartoon April by kit-bashing these two toys together. <P> 2) Negative: Okay, so Bebop and Rocksteady (and the Turtles themselves, and most other figures, but ESPECIALLY noticeable with those two) got SO MUCH extra sculpt detailing all over their bodies with their Super7 figures. Sssooo . . . why does April look like she was tooled in 1987? I get mimicking the general aesthetic, but . . . no seams, no folds, no wrinkles, no "realistic" texture to ANYTHING below the neck? I mean, the arms are okay-ish I GUESS, but the thighs and especially the lower torso? They're so . . . just FLAT. And her upper torso isn't much better, in terms of detailing (no, I'm not making a "flat" joke, I actually prefer that figures aren't so hyper-over-sexualized). <P> My point is, they didn't put NEARLY the effort into this figure that they did to others in the line, and it's OBVIOUS. She looks like a low-end TV-quality CGI model and not an actual real toy. She looks like a dollar-store figure, not a $45 collectors' piece. <P> . . . Still a better figure than Playmates' Classic Collection Shredder. *LMAO* And DEFINITELY a viable base to make a kick-@$$ cartoon accurate April IN SCALE with the NECA figures.
×
×
  • Create New...
Sign Up For The TNI Newsletter And Have The News Delivered To You!


Entertainment News International (ENI) is the #1 popular culture network for adult fans all around the world.
Get the scoop on all the popular comics, games, movies, toys, and more every day!

Contact and Support

Advertising | Submit News | Contact ENI | Privacy Policy

©Entertainment News International - All images, trademarks, logos, video, brands and images used on this website are registered trademarks of their respective companies and owners. All Rights Reserved. Data has been shared for news reporting purposes only. All content sourced by fans, online websites, and or other fan community sources. Entertainment News International is not responsible for reporting errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and or other liablities related to news shared here. We do our best to keep tabs on infringements. If some of your content was shared by accident. Contact us about any infringements right away - CLICK HERE