Jump to content

MikePrime

Members
  • Content Count

    637
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

32 Excellent

About MikePrime

  • Rank
    Cardassian

Previous Fields

  • Country
    United States

Contact Methods

  • Facebook
    reservoirdog4321
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Illinois
  1. I had some of those. The Thing was a great figure. The Human Torch was pretty nice and I liked that Spider-Man. The Superhero Showdown Captain America figure in your picture looks like a Marvel Zombies Cap that's nearly finished.
  2. How would that be any different from all of the Star Wars exploitation that's been done by Dark Horse Comics after all these years?
  3. From the article: "IDW will be lunching," I wonder what restaurant they're going to?
  4. That is surprisingly decent of them to do that second run of JoeCon sets.
  5. The commercial for Ritter Sport Chocolate is the Mentos commercial of the 21st century.

  6. In light of what the creator did with Star Wars in recent year, how can anyone be upset at Disney owning Lucasfilm?

    1. gruntcast

      gruntcast

      I'm pretty sure Lucas still will get reoccurring royalties and now we hopefully get a new trilogy, I mean the actors are in the right age for it.

  7. Okay, but does this then mean that Darth Vader was just being condescending towards the other bounty hunters? Why wouldn't he just use Boba Fett in the first place? As any sci-fi nerd should know, disintegration means there's nothing left of the victim, save perhaps for a pile of ashes, not two burnt skeltons. (See Star Trek II.) I'm sure that Darth Vader only said that to Boba Fett so that we, the audience, can infer that Boba Fett is one ruthless bounty hunter, nothing more.
  8. Another relaunch? That series must have really been selling poorly if IDW is relaunching G.I. Joe again. My cynicism regarding modern day comics remains grounded in reality, unfortunately.
  9. Don't you hate it when ebay sellers pad their item descriptions with pointless info, like full character descriptions that have not much to do with the toy being sold?

    1. yojoebro82

      yojoebro82

      Yes:) I just figure they don't have anything to do. I sold a movie Megatron, the only description was "Be sure to check my other auctions", still got $80 for him.

    2. GuitarDevil

      GuitarDevil

      I could imagine those sellers getting jobs as QVC pitch people...

       

  10. I liked this movie a lot. While logical from a business standpoint, I still think it was cruel to split this story into a two part movie.
  11. Looked at peopleofwalmart.com again. Walmart may not have the best clothes, but you can still put together a decent outfit. Cost is no excuse for any of the fashion nightmares in those pictures.

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. featofstrength

      featofstrength

      but it's too hard to get off the store provided rascal scooters to try on outfits.

    3. yojoebro82

      yojoebro82

      And if any of the clothes don't have a low cut neck line, how will the "ladies" have easy access to their own cleavage for easy cell phone storage????

    4. GuitarDevil

      GuitarDevil

      the real question is where did these people go b4 wahhmart was around? & are they purposely freakish just to get on the site?

  12. I really hope Hasbro goes the complete vintage route with these Kre-O toys, although I wouldn't be surprised if Hasbro used the delay of the G.I. Joe movie sequel to develop some movie Kre-O sets too.
  13. Okay. That's it pal. You've crossed the line and used your powers for evil.
×
×
  • Create New...






Entertainment News International (ENI) is the popular culture network for fans all around the world.
Get the scoop on all the popular comics, games, movies, toys, and more every day!

Contact and Support

Advertising | Submit News | Contact ENI | Privacy Policy

©Entertainment News International - All images, trademarks, logos, video, brands and images used on this website are registered trademarks of their respective companies and owners. All Rights Reserved. Data has been shared for news reporting purposes only. All content sourced by fans, online websites, and or other fan community sources. Entertainment News International is not responsible for reporting errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and or other liablities related to news shared here. We do our best to keep tabs on infringements. If some of your content was shared by accident. Contact us about any infringements right away - CLICK HERE