Jump to content

NewGuy

Members
  • Content Count

    249
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NewGuy

  1. Wait! Don't join in Viper! This dumb sh*t will think all us racists are bullying again! ALL A DAMN CONSPIRACY!! LOL!
  2. If it's retracted then you stop the fuss also! And again, you do the EXACT SAME THING I DID IN ATTACKING YOU! LOL! I was making a point of that! hahaha What I posted was directly from the muslim "holy scriptures" - why so offended? And again, I told you that I was not responding to anything you said! I was responding to others! Your "sycophantic" (spelled with a "y" by the way) BIG MOUTH jumped right in when it DID NOT CONCERN YOU!!! LOL!!! Now who's "delusional, pathetic, full of himself brain-dead zombie?!" LMAO!!! XD Who has "no integrity, arrogant, and a typical baseless moron" when I said NOT ONE THING TO YOU!! HAHAHAHAHA!!! I NEVER INSULTED YOU UNTIL YOU CAME IN ALL DUMB THINKING I WAS TALKING ABOUT YOU!! In the words of Barry Hussein, "You acted stupidly.!" And if you are going to spell b*tch put a "b" in it punk-b*tch! LMAO!!! @loll@ "Looking for a father?!" hahahaha Can't think of any good come-backs can you? I don't EVEN KNOW ORION!! LMAO!!! @loll@@loll@@loll@
  3. good real points the racist and bigots on these boards don't want to accept. I can respect your points because they are honest, fair and balanced even if I think the reason its being setup may have malice intent. Again, nowhere in Christianity was violence preached - those Christians who did vile acts in the "name of religion" are simply not Christian. Whereas, when muslims do so they ARE FOLLOWING MOHAMMAD TEACHINGS. What's so hard to understand about this? But like I said, before don't listen to me READ THE QUR'AN AND HADITHS FOR YOURSELF TO LEARN THE TRUTH. (Jews, Buddhists, Hindus and other respectable religions don't do the violence that islam does!)
  4. Again b/c you are too simply or refuse to! Btw, you can stop "fussing, arguing, and insulting" the people you disagree with! LOL!
  5. Wow, so much ignorance littlier man! LMAO! 1 Yes, and they ARE NOT CHRISTIANS stupid! Whereas muslims who (you defended) and do vile things are following the Qur'an and the Hadiths! Can't your feeble mind understand this? hahaha See you're stupid because you cannot use your head and reason! LMAO!! (But maybe you aren't feeble and stupid huh? Maybe you are so full of hatred against people here with your vendetta that you simply will not see reason or truth. hahahaha) 2 Anyway, ask a Jew if your remark was antisemitic? They'll see it as so as they have been blamed for Jesus' death for thousands of years. Again, you proclaim to be a Christian but know nothing of the its message - Jesus died for the sins of mankind - it was His mission and Jews created YOUR CHURCH!! (You quite frankly left that little tidbit out in your rush to argue! ) Again get and education or own up to yourself.. And I clearly understand your points all too well. You again claim to be conservative and Christian but you throw all that aside to settle your "beefs!" Now who's being evil according to your logic? If you were truly Christian wouldn't you just forgive these people you hate SO much? "Turn the other cheek?" LOL!
  6. Damn, you are slow and just don't get it do you? LOL! You and your buddy LA don't do the EXACT SAME THING ONLY WORSE?! hahahaha Hypocrite.. Keep apologizing for evil all to continue your crusade! LMAO!!! @loll@
  7. Totally legal and fair but we know it would be done with malice intent, same deal with this mosque and its proximity to ground zero. That is what Obama pointed out. Poor taste and a slight of hand F.U to people. Thank you for proving MY POINT STUPID!! LMAO!!! @loll@
  8. 1. You obviously do because you wrote this stupid! Then you say point taken so stop defending yourself and arguing against what I'm saying - you admitted you were wrong. LOL! And I wasn't "hellbent about proving you wrong" dummy! (Ego much?! LMAO!!!) I was replying to someone else - you protest too much. I could honestly give two sh*ts about you brothah. And "bullying?" Really? You use that term simply b/c you don't agree with what I said - if LA or JayC wrote it you'd be sucking their c*cks plain and simply asslick! And God's own and only Son was Jewish as well as everyone in the early church of which you profess to believe in! LOL! Again, get an education! By the way f*ck you for that antisemitic statement! (Wasn't it the Romans who did the actually killing? LMAO!!!) And who is the dummy - you are! You just have a hard-on and hatred for a couple people here and you know it! And again, just so you know - I could give sh*ts about you so get over yourself and quit your b*tch ass crying. LMAO!!!
  9. Let's just allow the KKK build a headquarters near the MLK Shrine in Atlanta then? Stupidity...
  10. Btw Superpowers? Do you know how many slaves who were brought to Europe or the Americas were already slaves in Africa? 2/3-3/4! Most of them were enslaved by other Africans! Europeans went to the cities in Africa to buy them from other Africans. They didn't go into the jungle like on Roots - they would have been vastly outnumbered and killed quickly even with firearms at their disposal. "West and west central African states, already involved in slave trading, supplied the Europeans with African slaves for export across the Atlantic." http://autocww.colorado.edu/~blackmon/E64ContentFiles/AfricanHistory/SlaveryInAfrica.html You know who ended slavery in Africa? White Christians!
  11. Jesus never promoted racism or said anything racist stupid. Any people who would honestly believe in islam ARE some of the dumbest people on earth! Just as bad as anyone who believes in Nazism are also "Superpowers." And as to slavery and Christianity... So tired of typing this and typing this - get an education man. "A lot of people want to throw Conservative Christians under the bus (particularly the NAACP as of late) - they mainly call them bigots and racists because they say the "good Christians" of the past endorsed slavery. See, they're bringing up the old, "argumentum ad verecundiam," the "old argument from outrage" many Christians and Christian critics have been debating for centuries.. But they are completely off base with this mockery and name calling - they do not know what the Bible actually states and do not know the history of the time.. See many theologians translate slaves as servants. (The previous translation was used by slave owners in the colonies and later the Southern States to lend credence to their version of slavery while still stating they were Christian) But when the Bible was written and afterward a "slave" for Christians and Jews was actually someone who was "indebted to someone" and not a person "dragged from a foreign land against their will." In Jesus' day it was actually the Greco-Roman world practiced what we think of as slavery (what was done in America.) The truth of the matter is Christians and Jews found this form of slavery repugnant. For Jews (what Jesus definitely was) Mosaic Law clearly limited "Greco-Roman style" slavery only to gentiles, and outlawed it completely for themselves. Leviticus 25: 39-55 stipulated that poor Jews who sold themselves to other Jews should be treated as hired servants, and given their freedom in the year of Jubilee, that is, after seven years' service. (Like the colonists with Indentured Servitude) In fact, the enslavement of Jews against their will was a capital offense. Deuteronomy 24:7 commands that "If a man be found stealing any of his brethren of the children of Israel, and makes merchandise of him, or sells him; then that thief shall die; and you will put evil away from among you." Also, Jews were commanded to buy out of slavery those Jews who had, through poverty, sold themselves to gentiles and their form of slavery. That part of Law stressed that while the former slave was serving his Jewish master, he should be treated leniently – in the words of Leviticus 25: 53, "the other shall not rule with rigor over him in thy sight." Jews were not to mistreat their slaves as slaves in the South were mistreated (and Greco-Roman world did..) And ancient slaves did have opportunities for social advancement and may have been considered part of the community with the free poor and again that was certainly not the case for the African chattel slaves of the 17th to 19th centuries in the Southern States. And again not the case with the South or Greco-Roman world. But onto Christianity.. Paul stated in Galatians 3:28 that "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for you are all one in Christ." This proves that Christians continued the same beliefs of Judaism towards slavery - and that a "slave" was simply a servant and both "master" and "slave" were equal in Jesus' eyes. Furthermore, while I'm not a Catholic, Clement of Alexandria and Lactantius insisted on their common humanity - and firmly stated that "slaves are men like us" to whom the Golden Rule applied, while Lactantius stated "Slaves are not slaves to us. We deem them brothers after the spirit, in religion fellow servants." Again something the Greco-Romans did not believe. So, Christianity (and Judaism) in regards to slavery required the humane treatment of "slaves." (Now some will mock and pick on Christianity and its followers by quoting Biblical verses where Jesus spoke on the "beating of slaves." But they again misconstrue His meaning - they leave out His message of humanity. The style of beating He spoke of was not violent! It is what many theologians would describe as "corporal punishment" - what many still do with their children today.. Many parents "beat" their kids when they do wrong.. It is just not the type of violent beating known in the South or in the Greco-Roman world!) Christianity's insistence of the essential humanity of the slave, being humane, and the common identity with the rest of the community laid the grounds for later Christians such as St. Gregory of Nyssa to attack the institution of slavery itself in the seventh century and led to the eventual end of it completely by abolitionists in the West by the 19th century. And I'm not throwing islam under the bus here but it is simply a historical fact that the Arab ancestors of those who would become muslims and later on muslims themselves practiced the Greco-Roman form of slavery. They did not follow what Jews and Christians believed. In fact it is also true that it was African muslims who introduced this form of slavery back to the Christian world. They were the ones who opened and ran the first slave house in Europe. Now it was indeed the greed of some Europeans and later Americans that made them business partners of the African slavers and that continued the Greco-Roman form of slavery. But they then misquoted the Bible concerning slavery to legitimize their vile acts - they were not Christian! So like I said, these mocking name callers should cut the crap and actually learn the Bible and learn the history of the time so they can find out the truth of the subject - before they try to defame others." Got it now dummy? Those who used the Bible and Christianity to support the version of slavery implemented in America and other Western countries WERE NOT CHRISTIANS! Just like Tim McVeigh, abortionist bombers, and killers AREN'T REAL CHRISTIANS! But islam and old MO DID SAY THESE RACIST THINGS! THEY DID INSTRUCT MUSLIMS THAT THIS FORM OF SLAVERY WAS RIGHT!! Stop trying to compare Jesus and real Christians to these savages just b/c you have a burr up your ass..
  12. LMFAO!!! @loll@ Muhammad Speaks #2: Islam - The misunderstood Religion
  13. Oh, history about and direct quotes from the "Religion of Peace" about slavery Orion! LOL! ISLAMIC BLACK SLAVE TRADE: The awful truth is that muslims did not practice what Judaism and Christianity described as slavery (what we in the West would now call "indentured servitude") and ravaged Africa for a 1...000 years before Europeans ever began to export black slaves. In fact, the Arabic word for "black" ("abed") is also the same word for "slave." Over 120 million blacks were murdered by islam in one of the greatest holocausts in history. Muhammad owned and sold black slaves. In fact, the teachings of islam offer explicit guidance in the details of the practice, thus endowing it with divine sanction. The fate of slaves in Arab countries was? well, let's just say there's a reason why you don't see many native blacks in Saudi Arabia or Jordan. Enslaved men could not bear children because they were often castrated, and the unfortunate Africans as a group did not ultimately survive the brutal treatment. Slavery was not entirely race-based in Islamic history (although it eventually became illegal to enslave an Arab). Hungary was pillaged of 3 million people over a 150 year period, and Muslim slave traders raided European coasts for well over 1000 years, killing, raping and taking slaves. Islam Looked Down on Blacks: its "sacred" Scriptures contain explicit denigrating remarks about Black people. Mohammad referred to Blacks as "raisin heads". (Sahih Al Bukhary vol. 1, no. 662 and vol. 9, no. 256). In another Hadith, Mohammed is quoted as saying that Blacks are, "pug-nosed slaves". (Sahih Moslem vol. 9 pages 46 and 47). Volume 4, Book 52, Number 80i: Narrated Abu Huraira ISLAM & SLAVERY http://www.youtube.c...h?v=Rvc4X6ti5Pc Again, is islam the "Religion of Peace?" Allah's Apostle said, "Allah welcomes two men with a smile; one of whom kills the other and both of them enter Paradise. One fights in Allah's Cause and gets killed. Later on Allah forgives the 'killer who also get martyred (In Allah's Cause).'" Here is a very important matter. We often wonder how Muslims kill each other and both parties scream "Jihad" as they kill each other. Mohammad says that Allah is happy to see them BOTH killing each other. The cause is not the point-- just kill. Qur'an 5:33 "The punishment for those who wage war against Allah and His Prophet and make mischief in the land, is to murder them, crucify them, or cut off a hand and foot on opposite sides...their doom is dreadful. They will not escape the fire, suffering constantly." Qur'an 8:12 "Your Lord inspired the angels with the message: 'I will terrorize the unbelievers. Therefore smite them on their necks and every joint and incapacitate them. Strike off their heads and cut off each of their fingers and toes." Bukhari: V4B52N260 "Ali burnt some [former Muslims alive] and this news reached Ibn Abbas, who said, 'Had I been in his place I would not have burnt them, as the Prophet said, "Don't punish with Allah's Punishment." No doubt, I would have killed them, for the Prophet said, "If a Muslim discards his Islamic religion, kill him." Anyway, holy sh*t, sad but true but some people out there would apologize for Hitler if he was still around! HAHAHAHA!!! >_<
  14. First off, I'm sick of islam apologists claiming Christian fundamentalists are just as "bad" and "dangerous" as muslim terrorists. Jesus never once preached violence - in fact He stopped fundamentalists from carrying out violence. The good people at Webster's defines fundamentalism as: Main Entry: fun·da·men·tal·ism Function: noun Date: 1922 1 a often capitalized : a movement in 20th century Protestantism emphasizing the literally interpreted Bible as fundamental to Christian life and teaching b : the beliefs of this movement c : adherence to such beliefs 2 : a movement or attitude stressing strict and literal adherence to a set of basic principles Therefore, Fundamentalist Christians would never commit such vile acts as terrorism. Tim McVeigh was not a Christian, period. Secondly, islam is all about violence - you can't just separate it from the terrorists. Don't go around condemning people when they point out the terrorists are muslim - that they are "perverting islam." That is simply not the case. And some will disagree with this and quote the peaceful messages in the beginning of the old koo-ran ignoring the hatred and violence that is written later. But understand in islam it is taught that if what is written disagrees with something else - the later takes precedence. (This is an example of abrogation, a method of interpretation that imposes the precepts of later-day verses over earlier ones. More violent and definitive later-day verses, written after mohammad had been victorious in Medina and Mecca, take precedence over earlier, milder verses written when mohammad lacked sufficient power.) But again, true believers in islam (as well as others - "useful idiots") will say this is all a lie - that it is again not about violence but also understand that islam preaches that a muslim should lie, "Taqiyya," to non-believers as a way to get them to lower their defenses. Now am I saying all muslims are evil and violent? Of course not. I am friends with many and would depend on them with my life - but they don't really believe in their faith. See once one becomes serious about islam they drink the "cult Kool-Aid." They believe everything that is written and believe me - violence is the message. "Fight and slay the non-believers wherever you find them" Qur'an (9:5) Anyway, when someone asks if the Qur'an really contains verses promoting violence? Summary Answer: The Qur'an contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called "hypocrites" and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter. Qur'an (2:191-193) - "And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution [of Muslims] is worse than slaughter [of non-believers]...and fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah." There is a good case to be made that the textual context of this particular passage is defensive war, even if the historical context was not. However, there are also two worrisome pieces to this verse. The first is that the killing of others is authorized in the event of "persecution" (a qualification that is ambiguous at best). The second is that fighting may persist until "religion is for Allah." The example set by Muhammad is not reassuring. Qur'an (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not." Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. Qur'an (4:95) - "Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their persons. Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith) Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward" This passage criticizes "peaceful" Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah's eyes. And follow-up questions for true believers of islam: Does Israel have a right to exist? Is it okay to marry a 9 year old girl? Should a thief have their right hand cut off? Should a person have a hand & foot on the opposite side cut off? Should a woman be stoned to death for adultery? Should fornicators be given 99 lashes? Should those who leave Islam be killed? If you left Islam should you be killed? If your parents left Islam should they be killed? Is it okay to lie to advance Islam? Is it okay to call Christians & Jews, pigs & apes? Is Jizya tax fair? Do you support female circumcision?(female genital mutilation) Finally look, if you believe me I don't care but read the book for yourself and find out the truth. PS: And FYI, it's the only "religion" that still enacts such violence and bigotry. All others religions other than islam do not commit violence in the name of their religion any longer.
  15. Three Things About Islam WESTERN LIBERALS DON'T KNOW Cheers!
  16. Dude, is it not true?! Holy sh*t! LOL!
  17. I don't agree with everything Ann says but f*ck she's dead on about this! F*cking RINOs like those two are the reason I quit being one!
  18. And the fact that JayC let a blatant racist like him come back without one apology is complete and utter bullsh*t! @bs@ Two sets of f*ckin' rules going on in this place!
  19. VH you WHITE DEVIL! LOL! @loll@
  20. I think we'd be more civil for the most part.. Not take things the wrong way also as we communicate better talking in person.
  21. That's fine by me - best we can do right now! LOL! But be sure to check out other messages by the preacher I posted though - really good stuff if you're interested!
×
×
  • Create New...
Sign Up For The TNI Newsletter And Have The News Delivered To You!


Entertainment News International (ENI) is the #1 popular culture network for adult fans all around the world.
Get the scoop on all the popular comics, games, movies, toys, and more every day!

Contact and Support

Advertising | Submit News | Contact ENI | Privacy Policy

©Entertainment News International - All images, trademarks, logos, video, brands and images used on this website are registered trademarks of their respective companies and owners. All Rights Reserved. Data has been shared for news reporting purposes only. All content sourced by fans, online websites, and or other fan community sources. Entertainment News International is not responsible for reporting errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and or other liablities related to news shared here. We do our best to keep tabs on infringements. If some of your content was shared by accident. Contact us about any infringements right away - CLICK HERE