Jump to content

Editorials without discussion are propaganda


Steelheart

Recommended Posts

Jay Cochran's "editorial" about wokeism is itself a sterling example of intolerance: no opportunities for comments and no mention of it in the forums.

Leftists like Mr. Cochran are quick to defend wokeism and attack anyone who disagrees with turning everything (films, TV, pop culture, even action figures) into propaganda for leftist ideology. They are also quick to betray their own calls for "inclusion," which generally mean "including only those who share their fascistic viewpoints."

I've been visiting TNI since it went by its original name but will no longer visit this site or its affiliates as long as it's run this way.

 

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Steelheart said:

Jay Cochran's "editorial" about wokeism is itself a sterling example of intolerance: no opportunities for comments and no mention of it in the forums.

Leftists like Mr. Cochran are quick to defend wokeism and attack anyone who disagrees with turning everything (films, TV, pop culture, even action figures) into propaganda for leftist ideology. They are also quick to betray their own calls for "inclusion," which generally mean "including only those who share their fascistic viewpoints."

I've been visiting TNI since it went by its original name but will no longer visit this site or its affiliates as long as it's run this way.

 

 

LOL your commenting here aren't you? Unfortunately many have demonstrated and from your tone here probably one of those that can't seem to talk about these things without it devolving into something that is inevitably will be locked. And being the mods here are volunteers I choose to save them the hassle of having to deal with that. We have plenty of other places on social media you can express yourself though. And what your really seemingly are mad about is I didnt link the editorial to a thread here for you to rant about it on the main page so you could get attention. Yeah if you think I am going to loose sleep you may never return based on this post, I hate to break it to you but you would be wrong. Im sure though you will find someplace to rant.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Steelheart said:

Jay Cochran's "editorial" about wokeism is itself a sterling example of intolerance: no opportunities for comments and no mention of it in the forums.

Leftists like Mr. Cochran are quick to defend wokeism and attack anyone who disagrees with turning everything (films, TV, pop culture, even action figures) into propaganda for leftist ideology. They are also quick to betray their own calls for "inclusion," which generally mean "including only those who share their fascistic viewpoints."

I've been visiting TNI since it went by its original name but will no longer visit this site or its affiliates as long as it's run this way.

 

 

Woke (/ˈwoʊk/ WOHK) is an English adjective meaning 'alert to racial prejudice and discrimination' that originated in African-American Vernacular English. 

Definition of fascism: a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition

It appears steelheart might be confused of the definitions,he seems to be mixing them, and he's literally posting his opinion instead of being censored.

He apparently is exhibiting some sort of perceived greivance.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Scifantasy said:

Woke (/ˈwoʊk/ WOHK) is an English adjective meaning 'alert to racial prejudice and discrimination' that originated in African-American Vernacular English. 

Definition of fascism: a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition

It appears steelheart might be confused of the definitions,he seems to be mixing them, and he's literally posting his opinion instead of being censored.

He apparently is exhibiting some sort of perceived greivance.

 

 

 

You're right, and he is, but this doesn't need to keep going. This thread is locked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Satam locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Find Action Figures on Ebay

×
×
  • Create New...
Sign Up For The TNI Newsletter And Have The News Delivered To You!


Entertainment News International (ENI) is the #1 popular culture network for adult fans all around the world.
Get the scoop on all the popular comics, games, movies, toys, and more every day!

Contact and Support

Advertising | Submit News | Contact ENI | Privacy Policy

©Entertainment News International - All images, trademarks, logos, video, brands and images used on this website are registered trademarks of their respective companies and owners. All Rights Reserved. Data has been shared for news reporting purposes only. All content sourced by fans, online websites, and or other fan community sources. Entertainment News International is not responsible for reporting errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and or other liablities related to news shared here. We do our best to keep tabs on infringements. If some of your content was shared by accident. Contact us about any infringements right away - CLICK HERE