MOTUC Webstor Hi-Res Images
#4
Posted 21 May 2009 - 12:12 PM
#5
Posted 21 May 2009 - 12:46 PM
I loved Webstor as a kid, and he was awesome in 200X, but this figure is just a little too plain for me.
Of course I'll still be getting him, but I would have been more pleased with something just a little closer to the 200X staction.
#6
Posted 21 May 2009 - 01:01 PM
#7
Posted 21 May 2009 - 02:21 PM
#8
Posted 21 May 2009 - 05:01 PM
#12
Posted 21 May 2009 - 06:37 PM
#13
Posted 21 May 2009 - 07:33 PM
#15
Posted 22 May 2009 - 03:11 AM
#16
Posted 22 May 2009 - 04:55 PM
#17
Posted 22 May 2009 - 05:13 PM
He looks exactly like I'd expect - it's too unfair to compare him to his 200X staticon. I think the Horsemen did a great compromize with the extra legs.
Only thing I'm not liking is all the "skeletor-mold" figures we're getting - Skele, MerMan, Zodac, Hordak's feet I think, and now Webstor - but that's how it was in the 80s - the majority of people on Eternia only have 3 toes!
#19
Posted 22 May 2009 - 08:14 PM
Bandalero, on May 22 2009, 06:13 PM, said:
He looks exactly like I'd expect - it's too unfair to compare him to his 200X staticon. I think the Horsemen did a great compromize with the extra legs.
Only thing I'm not liking is all the "skeletor-mold" figures we're getting - Skele, MerMan, Zodac, Hordak's feet I think, and now Webstor - but that's how it was in the 80s - the majority of people on Eternia only have 3 toes!
Originaly there was only 2 molds for bodys. Skeletors and Hemans
#20
Posted 22 May 2009 - 11:22 PM
Bandalero, on May 22 2009, 06:13 PM, said:
It's cost effective at this point, and that's what Mattel's biggest concern has been from the start. They wanted to get as many different figures as possible out of the existing molds to keep costs down.
I think they can start expanding some, but it's likely that most of these first-year figures were decided upon because of the reusable parts before they knew how successful the line would be. The good part is they're at least thinking about characters who are still appealing, like Webstor who didn't have a 200X figure.
If they continue this next year (only doing the figures because they can be made from existing parts), I'll be a little put off, but for now I think it's fine.
#21
Posted 23 May 2009 - 10:30 AM
I'm loving this figure. Already got my subscription, so it's in the bag for me!
#22
Posted 24 May 2009 - 05:54 AM
Eric, on May 21 2009, 06:01 PM, said:
my point exacly. think about if that wasnt there, then the figure would not be a little special at all.
#23
Posted 24 May 2009 - 10:08 AM
Eric, on May 23 2009, 05:22 AM, said:
Bandalero, on May 22 2009, 06:13 PM, said:
It's cost effective at this point, and that's what Mattel's biggest concern has been from the start. They wanted to get as many different figures as possible out of the existing molds to keep costs down.
I think they can start expanding some, but it's likely that most of these first-year figures were decided upon because of the reusable parts before they knew how successful the line would be. The good part is they're at least thinking about characters who are still appealing, like Webstor who didn't have a 200X figure.
If they continue this next year (only doing the figures because they can be made from existing parts), I'll be a little put off, but for now I think it's fine.
Matty did say that future figures that had their 80s counter-parts share pieces will again. I do not mind the re-use of parts or molds as long as the figure still looks good. They will have to make entirely new sculpts for characters like Modulok or Psyclone
#24
Posted 24 May 2009 - 12:37 PM
shokker, on May 24 2009, 06:54 AM, said:
Eric, on May 21 2009, 06:01 PM, said:
my point exacly. think about if that wasnt there, then the figure would not be a little special at all.
Point taken.

Help



















